Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/143/2026 of RUPESH RANJAN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.143 of 2026 Rupesh Ranjan, aged about 39 years, S/o-Late Raj Kumar Ram, resident of -New Area, Morabadi, P.O-Ranchi University, P.S-Bariatu, District-Ranchi .…… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand

2026:JHHC:14534-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Civil) No.143 of 2026

Rupesh Ranjan, aged about 39 years, S/o-Late Raj Kumar Ram, resident of-New Area, Morabadi, P.O-Ranchi University, P.S-Bariatu, District-Ranchi

.……

Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Shri Jitendra Kumar Singh, S/o-not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Principal Secretary, Department of Labour, Employment and training, Government of Jharkhand having its office, At Nepal House, P.O & P.S-Doranda, District-Ranchi.

3. Shri Ravi Ranjan Kumar Vikram, S/o not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Labour Commissioner, Ranchi having its office, at Shram Bhawan, P.O & P.S-Doranda, District Ranchi.

4. Shri Rejush Barh, S/o-not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Ranchi having its office having its office, at Shram Bhawan, P.O & P.S-Doranda, District Ranchi.

5. Mr. Manjunath Bhajantnri, S/o not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Ranchi, P.O & P.S-Lalpur, District-Ranchi.

…….

Opp. Parties

--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, Advocate

----------- 08/Dated:12th May, 2026

Perused the report and having considered the averments made therein, particularly the undertaking for remaining careful in future as well as not to repeat such mistakes, the report and explanation are accepted.

2. Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the order has been complied with, since, the appointment has already been issued. He has further submitted that the petitioner has also given joining.

3. Therefore, he has submitted that he is not pressing the instant contempt case.

4. Considering the same, the instant contempt case is closed and disposed of accordingly.

5. Pending I.A(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.)

Dated: 12.05.2026 Saket/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead