Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/810/2025 of SIDHARTH SHANKAR CHAUDHARY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 810 of 2025 …. Sidharth Shankar Chaudhary, aged about 58 years, S/o Late Arbind Chaudhary, R/o- Gautam Green City, Anuj-31, P.O. Getalhatu, PS- BIT Mesra (OP), Dist- Ranchi- 835217 (Jharkhand)

2026:JHHC:12877

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Civil) No. 810 of 2025

….

Sidharth Shankar Chaudhary, aged about 58 years, S/o Late Arbind Chaudhary, R/o- Gautam Green City, Anuj-31, P.O.

Getalhatu, PS- BIT Mesra (OP), Dist- Ranchi- 835217

(Jharkhand)

……Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand,

2. Dilip Toppo, the Principal Secretary, the Personnel Administration Reform and Rajbhasa Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand,

3. Om Prakash Sah, the Joint Secretary, the Personnel Administration Reform and Rajbhasa Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand

……Opp. Parties

-----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

-----

For the Petitioner : None

For the State

: Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, SC-V

……

Order No.11/29th April, 2026

1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner even today i.e. 29.04.2026. However, Mr. Kishore Kumar Singh, learned SC-V appearing on behalf of the State is present.

2. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the judgment dated 22.03.2024 passed by this Court in W. P. (S) 6891 of 2017 (i.e. the Annexure-7) has been complied with.

3. It is further submitted that the punishment order has been withdrawn by the Authority concerned and even the case of the petitioner for grant of promotion was considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) and however, due to sanction of criminal prosecution in two cases and pendency of department proceeding, the decision of Departmental Promotion

2026:JHHC:12877

Committee (DPC) has been kept in sealed cover .

4. It is further submitted that the financial benefits have been directed to be disbursed to the petitioner and in support of this learned counsel for the State has produced the photocopy of the Letter No. 3 (Arop) (Court Case) 15-19/2025 Ka.1524 dated 12.03.2026 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government addressed to the Accountant General (A&E) Jharkhand, Ranchi.

5. Let this letter be kept on record.

6. Under the circumstances, the order dated 22.03.2024 passed by this Court in WP(S) 6891 of 2017 is complied with.

7. Accordingly, this Contempt Case (Civil) No. 810 of 2025 is closed and stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 29th April, 2026 Nishant/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead