Jharkhand High Court

W.P.(Cr.)/185/2026 of SIMA GHOSH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.185 of 2026 (H.B.) ------ Sima Ghosh, W/o of Bimal Kr. Ghosh, Aged about 35 Years, R/O Shridhar Colony No.1, P.O-&P.S-Radhanagar, District-Sahebganj …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The

2026:JHHC:12357-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.185 of 2026 (H.B.)

------

Sima Ghosh, W/o of Bimal Kr. Ghosh, Aged about 35 Years, R/O

Shridhar Colony No.1, P.O-&P.S-Radhanagar, District-Sahebganj

…. ….

Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. The Director General of Police, having office Police Head quarter, Dhurwa, P.O-Dhurwa, P.S-Jagarnnathpur, District-Ranchi.

3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Santhal Pargana, Dumka, Office at-Near Blok office Dumka, P.O & P.S-Dumka, District-Dumka.

4. The Superintendent of Police Sahibganj, having office S.P. Office Sahibganj, P.O & P.S-Sahibganj, District-Sahibganj.

5. The Officer In-charge, Radhanagar Police Station, Sahibganj, P.O- Sahibganj, P.S-Radhanagar, District-Sahibganj.

..... .... Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha, Advocate

Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. S.C.-II

Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-II

------

04/Dated: 28.04.2026

1. In pursuant to the order dated 24th April, 2026, the Corpus has been produced by Mrs. Aruna Kumari Toppo, Assistant Sub- Inspector of Police, posted in the Rajmahal Police Station.

2. This Court has asked from the Corpus that whether she is willing to live with Rakesh Baidh to whom she has solemnized marriage.

3. She has stated that she is happily residing in her matrimonial house and has made no complaint whatsoever.

2026:JHHC:12357-DB

4. The petitioner, namely, Sima Ghosh along with her husband, namely, Bimal Kumar Ghosh is also present.

5. They have stated before this Court that they are not in a position to say anything in a situation where their daughter has solemnized marriage to Rakesh Baidh.

6. They have also stated that the Corpus since is major now and since she has chosen her life partner, therefore, they are nothing to say.

7. This Court, considering the aforesaid statement, is of the view that instant writ petition needs to be disposed of.

8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Pending Interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 28.04.2026 Rohit/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead