Jharkhand High Court
FA/185/2025 of CHAMPA KACHHAP Vs CHINTAMANI KUMARI on 16 April 2026
Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 185 of 2025 --------- Champa Kachhap son of Jerka Kacchap aged about 38 years, resident of Village-Tonka, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand)-834003. … … Appellant Versus Chintamani Kumar
[2026:JHHC:10802-DB]
Page | 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
F.A. No. 185 of 2025
---------
Champa Kachhap son of Jerka Kacchap aged about 38 years, resident of Village-Tonka, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand)-834003.
… … Appellant
Versus
Chintamani Kumar wife of Champa Kacchap, daughter of Dr.
Sambhu Bhagat, Resident of Village-Sisai, P.O.-Beyasi, P.S.
Chando, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand)-835301.
… … Respondent
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
----------
For the Appellant
: Mr. Kumar Nitish, Advocate
Ms. Medha Catharine M. Kandulna, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Jinid Seteng Horo, Advocate
---------
08/Dated: 16th April, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Reference may be made to the order dated 09.02.2026.
2. The mediation report is available on record kept at Flag-‘M’.
3. Learned counsel for the both the parties have submitted that in terms of the final settlement agreement/mediation report, the present appeal may be disposed of.
4. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the mediation report which is kept at Flag-‘M’.
5. Considering the settlement arrived at in between the parties as referred in the mediation report, duly been signed by both the parties, this Court is of the view that the present appeal is to be disposed of.
6. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 16th April, 2026 Saurabh/-