Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./204/2026 of M/S HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Vs M/S BRAHAMAND MINING AND CONSTRUCTION on 8 April 2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C. M. P. No. 204 of 2026 …. M/s Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited having its registered office at 3rd Floor, NBCC Square, Plot No. IIIF/2, Action Area- III, New Town, Rajarhat, PO- Akanstekshari, PS- Technocity, Kolkata through
2026:JHHC:10135
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C. M. P. No. 204 of 2026
….
M/s Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited having its registered office at 3rd Floor, NBCC Square, Plot No. IIIF/2, Action Area- III, New Town, Rajarhat, PO- Akanstekshari, PS- Technocity, Kolkata through its Zonal Head, Mr. T.K Roy, aged about 45 years, Zonal Office at HSCL Administrative Building, Naya More, Bokaro Steel City, PO +PS-Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand
…… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/s Brahamand Mining & Construction through its Partner- Bijay Vikram Singh, R/o Lohanchal City, P.O. & P.S. Sector-12, District Bokaro, Jharkhand-827012
2. The State of Jharkhand
.…… Opp. Parties
----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kumar Rai, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, SC-I
Mr. Mihir Kunal Ekka, AC to SC-I
…..
02/08.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The instant C. M. P. No. 204 of 2026 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025, which stood dismissed on 14.11.2025 for non-compliance of the order dated 07.11.2025 passed by this Court in W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to illness of the Advocate Clerk, who was suffering from fever, the requisites could not be filed within time and as such, W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025 stood dismissed due to non-compliance of the order dated 07.11.2025 passed by this Court. However, learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to file requisites within one week, if the W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025 is directed to be restored. It is further
2026:JHHC:10135
submitted that the petitioner will remain careful in future and hence, C. M. P. No. 204 of 2026 may be allowed and W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025 may be restored to its original file.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State raised no objection.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the averments made in para-6, 7 and 8 of the C.M.P. No. 204 of 2026, the present C.M.P. No. 204 of 2026 is allowed and W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025 is restored to its original file.
6. However, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file requisites in W. P. (C) No. 5795 of 2025 within one week from today.
7. Office to list this case as per roster before the Appropriate Bench.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 08.04.2026 Kamlesh/