Karnataka High Court
WP/105972/2024 of SIDDALINGAPPA SON OF SHARANAPPA YALAGI Vs THE TAHASILDAR on 1 October 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13382 WP No. 105972 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105972 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SIDDALINGAPPA SON OF SHARANAPPA YALAGI, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC:
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13382
WP No. 105972 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 105972 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
SIDDALINGAPPA SON OF
SHARANAPPA YALAGI,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
RESIDING AT KOTBAL VILLAGE,
TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG-582209.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH ANDANIMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE TAHASILDAR, RON TALUKA
RON, DIST: GADAG-582209.
2.
KUBERAPPA SON OF
DODDAVERAPPA JANGANNAVAR,
AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
RESIDING AT JALKI VILLAGE,
TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG-582209.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO RESPONDENT NO.1
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO MUTATE THE NAME OF
THE PETITIONER HEREIN AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ISSUE A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ORDER/DIRECTION
DIRECTING
THE
RESPONDENT
TO
CONSIDER
THE
REPRESENTATION
DATED
08-12-2023
OF
PETITIONER
(ANNEXURE-C) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC.
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13382
WP No. 105972 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 119