Karnataka High Court
MFA/101705/2023 of SRI YALLAPPA S/O RANGAPPA HOSAMANI Vs SMT. VIDYAVATI W/O PRAKASH GHATNATTI on 24 September 2026
2024:KHC-D:17715 MFA No. 101705 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101705 OF 2023 (MV-D) BETWEEN: SRI YALLAPPA S/O RANGAPPA HOSAMANI AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC ARMY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101705 OF 2023 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
SRI YALLAPPA S/O RANGAPPA HOSAMANI
AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC ARMY SERVICE,
R/O. MEG CENER 9/13 G PLN TV COY,
TQ. -3 M S NAGAR,.
BENGALURU-560033
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. VIDYAVATI W/O PRAKASH GHATNATTI
AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
2.
KUMAR PRAVEEN S/O PRAKASH GHATNATTI
AGE. 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT
3.
KUMAR SHIVAPPA S/O PRAKASH GHATNATTI
AGE. 20 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
4.
SMT. GANGAVVA W/O PARAPPA GHATNATTI
AGE. 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF MALAPUR VILLAGE,
TALUKA -MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT.
5.
SRI VITTAL S/O HOLEPPA JOGI
AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O BUDNI B K VILLAGE,
TALUKA -MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed
by SAROJA
HANGARAKI
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
MFA FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24.01.2023
PASSED IN MVC NO.30/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST
CLASS, AND MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL-IX, MUDHOL, IN SO FAR AS FIXING THE LIABILITY OF THE APPELLANT
TO THE EXTENT OF 50% OF THE COMPENSATION AND IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)
This Court, vide order dated 08.02.2024, has ordered as follows: “Finally, two weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the matter be listed for dismissal.”
2. Till date office objections have not been complied with. Hence, the above matter has been listed this day.
3. Even today, the matter was passed over in the morning session and the learned counsel was permitted to comply with the office objections and the matter was called in the afternoon session. However, the office objections have not been complied with.
4. Having regard to the order dated 08.02.2024, the above appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
SD/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PMP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 150