Karnataka High Court
CCC/100388/2025 of SIDRAM ALLAPPA MELAVANKI Vs SHRI NAGESH DATTU KOLKAR on 24 September 2026
100388/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD [SIDRAM ALLAPPA MELAVANKI AND OTHERS VS. SHRI NAGESH DATTU KOLKAR] 08.01.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL ORAL ORDER Case is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is absent. As per
CCC NO. 100388/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
[SIDRAM ALLAPPA MELAVANKI AND OTHERS
VS.
SHRI NAGESH DATTU KOLKAR]
08.01.2026
(VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)
CORAM:
ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Case is called out.
The learned Counsel for the Complainant is absent.
As per Order dated : 14.11.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections.
But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 14.11.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied.
The learned Counsel for the Complainant is also absent. This shows that, the Complainant is not interested in proceeding with the matter.
As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended.
As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject.
- 2 - CCC NO. 100388/2025
Hence, the following Order is passed by exercising the powers as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules.
ORDER
The Contempt Petition filed by the Complainant under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sec.11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act – 1971 is dismissed for non-compliance of the office objections, with no order as to costs.
The Complainant is entitled to apply for setting aside this Order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959.
Sd/- (JERALD RUDOLPH MENDONCA) ADDL. REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) & NOMINATED REGISTRAR
List No.: 56 Sl No.: 49