Karnataka High Court

MFA/103985/2022 of SMT HONNAVVA ALIAS SHANKRAVVA W/O KESHAPPA CHAVAN Vs MARUTI S/O SHANKRAPPA ILGER on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103985 OF 2022 (MV) BETWEEN 1 . SMT HONNAVVA @ SHANKRAVVA W/O KESHAPPA CHAVAN AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE R/O JANATHA PLOT, TQ. RON DIST.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103985 OF 2022 (MV)

BETWEEN

1 .

SMT HONNAVVA @ SHANKRAVVA

W/O KESHAPPA CHAVAN

AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE

R/O JANATHA PLOT, TQ. RON

DIST. GADAG

2 .

SMT. SHARADA W/O KRISHNA KUMAR CHAVAN

AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE

R/O JANATHA PLOT, TQ. RON

DIST. GADAG

... APPELLANTS

(By SRI : C B SHAKUNAVALLI)

AND

1 .

MARUTI S/O SHANKRAPPA ILGER

AGE. MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS

R/O SAMMASAGI, TQ. HANGAL,

DIST. HAVERI-580004

2 .

THE BRANCH MANAGER

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

STATION ROAD, GADAG

3 .

THE BRANCH MANAGER

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

1ST FLOOR, KRISHNA AGENCY BUILDING,

P.B.ROAD, HAVERI-581110.

2

(COVER NOTE NO. 602508/31/12/6300000008, VALID FROM 02.04.2012 TO 01.04.2013

…RESPONDENTS

* * * * *

This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 13.08.2019 passed in MVC No.97/2014 on the file of The Principal Senior Civil Judge, and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadag.

This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE

//COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 29.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 103985 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 13.02.2025.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SD/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

T By: vg

C By: vk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead