Karnataka High Court
MFA/25121/2013 of RAJAWWA W/O.HUSENSAB PINJAR Vs THE ASST. COMMISSIONER on 15 September 2026
No.25121/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF JUNE, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.25121/2013 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RAJAWWA, W/O.HUSSAINSAB PINJAR, AGE:70 YEARS,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.25121/2013
(LAC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RAJAWWA, W/O.HUSSAINSAB PINJAR,
AGE:70 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O. RANEBENNUR, TQ. RANEBENNUR,
DIST: HAVERI – 581115.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA
& SRI. A. B. PATIL, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
AND THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
HAVERI SUB DIVISION, HAVERI.
J
MAMATHA
Digitally signed
by J MAMATHA
Location:
DHARWAD
Date:
2022.06.10
11:52:04 +0530
2.
THE SECRETARY
APMC RANEBENNUR,
RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
HAVERI,
DIST: HAVERI.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. MALLIKARJUN BASAREDDY, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE
LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS
AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT
AND
AWARD
DATED
17.11.2012
PASSED
BY
THE
PRINCIPAL
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
J.M.F.C.
RENEBENNUR IN L.A.C. NO.27/2006 AND ENHANCE THE
COMPENSATION AMOUNT FROM RS.2,86,000/- PER ACRE
TO RS.10,00,000/- PER ACRE, (RS.25,000/- GUNATAS IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
P. KRISHNA BHAT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
This appeal being of the year 2013 sufficient time was there for compliance. However, compliance is not made by paying the deficit court fee. A Co-ordinate bench vide order dated 21.04.2022 as said under: “List this matter for dismissal in the first week of June-2022, as it is noticed that the deficit Court fee has not been paid till date.”
In view of the above peremptory order appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
RH,SSP