Karnataka High Court
WP/12842/2008 of MAHESH Vs MANAGING COMMITTEE MASJID SUNNI OF AHLI on 3 September 2026
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.12842/2008 (GM WAKF) BETWEEN: 1. MAHESH S/O MARABASAPPA HOSKOPPA, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O PALA VILLAGE, MUNDGOD TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. 2. MALLESHAPPA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
WRIT PETITION NO.12842/2008 (GM WAKF)
BETWEEN:
1.
MAHESH S/O MARABASAPPA HOSKOPPA,
AGED 39 YEARS,
R/O PALA VILLAGE, MUNDGOD TALUK,
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.
2.
MALLESHAPPA S/O BASANNA SAKANHALLI,
AGED 42 YEARS,
R/O BHADRAPUR VILLAGE, POST PALA,
MUNDGOD TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.
3.
SHIVAJI S/O KARIYAPPA HIRABAI,
AGED 37 YEARS,
R/O HOSANAGAR VILLAGE,
POST PALA, MUNDGOD TALUK,
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI MOHAN BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND :
1.
MANAGING COMMITTEE,
MASJID SUNNI OF AHLI,
SUNNAT JAMATH, PALA VILLAGE,
MUNDGOD TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
2.
NOORANI MASJID JAMATHUL MUSLIMEEN,
PALA VILLAGE, TALUK MUNDGOD,
: 2 :
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3.
KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF
NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD,
BANGALORE 52,
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI AHAMED ALI RAHIMANSHAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1)
(BY M/S.VASANTHI ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
(BY SRI D.L.LADKHAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DT. 9.10.2007 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA
WAKF
TRIBUNAL,
BELGAUM
DIVISION,
BELGAUM,
VIDE
ANNEXURE-S AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DT. 7.1.2000 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE- H AND THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DT. 2.2.2000
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETEE DT. 10.3.2000 ISSUED
AND PUBLISHED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-J.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING , THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
None appears for the petitioners.
Matter is of the year-2008. Left with no other alternative, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD JUDGE CKK