Karnataka High Court

WP/12842/2008 of MAHESH Vs MANAGING COMMITTEE MASJID SUNNI OF AHLI on 3 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.12842/2008 (GM WAKF) BETWEEN: 1. MAHESH S/O MARABASAPPA HOSKOPPA, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O PALA VILLAGE, MUNDGOD TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. 2. MALLESHAPPA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

WRIT PETITION NO.12842/2008 (GM WAKF)

BETWEEN:

1.

MAHESH S/O MARABASAPPA HOSKOPPA,

AGED 39 YEARS,

R/O PALA VILLAGE, MUNDGOD TALUK,

UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

2.

MALLESHAPPA S/O BASANNA SAKANHALLI,

AGED 42 YEARS,

R/O BHADRAPUR VILLAGE, POST PALA,

MUNDGOD TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

3.

SHIVAJI S/O KARIYAPPA HIRABAI,

AGED 37 YEARS,

R/O HOSANAGAR VILLAGE,

POST PALA, MUNDGOD TALUK,

UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI MOHAN BHAT, ADVOCATE)

AND :

1.

MANAGING COMMITTEE,

MASJID SUNNI OF AHLI,

SUNNAT JAMATH, PALA VILLAGE,

MUNDGOD TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA,

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.

2.

NOORANI MASJID JAMATHUL MUSLIMEEN,

PALA VILLAGE, TALUK MUNDGOD,

: 2 :

UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT,

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3.

KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF

NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD,

BANGALORE 52,

REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI AHAMED ALI RAHIMANSHAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1)

(BY M/S.VASANTHI ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)

(BY SRI D.L.LADKHAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED ORDER DT. 9.10.2007 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA

WAKF

TRIBUNAL,

BELGAUM

DIVISION,

BELGAUM,

VIDE

ANNEXURE-S AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER

DT. 7.1.2000 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE- H AND THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DT. 2.2.2000

PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETEE DT. 10.3.2000 ISSUED

AND PUBLISHED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-J.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING , THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

None appears for the petitioners.

Matter is of the year-2008. Left with no other alternative, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

SD JUDGE CKK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead