Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/101030/2022 of DHRUVA S/O ANIL MADAN Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 September 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2469 CRL.P No. 101030 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101030 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: DHRUVA S/O ANIL MADAN AGE 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2469
CRL.P No. 101030 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101030 OF 2022
(482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
DHRUVA S/O ANIL MADAN
AGE 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
R/O. #75, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SANMATI NAGAR, DHARWAD
DIST DHARWAD.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH (EXCISE PS
DHARWAD SUB DIVISION)
SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE CRIMINAL PETITION BY QUASHING
THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.292/2022 ARISING OUT OF
EXCISE P.S.CRIME NO.17/2021 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT
FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 20(b) 25
AND 8(c) OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC ACT 1985
PENDING BEFORE THE II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC II COURT
DHARWAD IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 IS
CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2469
CRL.P No. 101030 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has retired from the case.
3. Taking note of the fact that the petitioner is duly informed about the retirement of the learned counsel, he has not engaged any other counsel, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM / CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8