Karnataka High Court
RFA/100147/2018 of MRS.JACINTA W/O. JOSEPH FARNANDES Vs NORBERT FRANCIS MENEZES on 29 August 2026
2024:KHC-D:6421 RFA No. 100147 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100147/2018(DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: MRS. JACINTA W/O. JOSEPH FERNANDES, AGE: 58 YERS, OCC: LAND AND HOUSEHOLD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100147/2018(DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MRS. JACINTA
W/O. JOSEPH FERNANDES,
AGE: 58 YERS,
OCC: LAND AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: ROOM NO.44, BUILDING NO.56,
B. D. B. CLOCKS, WORLI, MUMBAI-18,
REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER,
SHRIDHAR S/O. AMRUTIRAO GHASARI,
AGED ABOUT 47 EYARS,
OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/O: CTS NO.5518, PLOT NO.12,
’SAKALP BUILDING’, 6TH CROSS,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 002.
…PETITIONER
(BY MRS. JACINTA
W/O. JOSEPH FERNANDES IS ABSENT)
AND:
1.
NORBERT FRANCIS MENEZES,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
OCC: PROPRIETOR
"WHITE WATER LIVING",
R/O: AMBELI ILAVA GRAM,
POST:GANESHAGUDI, TQ:JOIDA,
UTTAR KANNADA – 581 301.
2.
MR. IGNATIUS CAJETAN BRAGANZA,
S/O. LEO GRANSIS BRAGANZA,
Digitally
signed by
MANJANNA E
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 65 EYARS,
OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O: H. NO.A-1747, AGAV VADDO,
CALANGUTE, BARDEZ, GOA.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR
JOIDA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA – 581 301.
4.
THE SUB-REGISTRAR
HALIYAL,
DIST:UTTAR KANNADA – 581 301.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI RAMESH I. ZIRALI, AND
SRI SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI VITTHAL S. TELI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI
RULE OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.02.2018
PASSED
BY
THE
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE,
HALIYAL
IN
O.S.NO.10/2017 OLD O.S.NO.38/2009 AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE SUIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to retire from the case. He has enclosed the acknowledgement issued by the appellant, dated 25.03.2024 for having taken back the entire papers. Memo is accepted. Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to retire from the case. Appellant called out absent. The appeal is of the year 2018. It appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is dismissed for default i.e. for non prosecution.
SD/- JUDGE
AC/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1