Karnataka High Court

RFA/100510/2022 of SMT. AKKAMMA D/O HANUMAPPA BATAKURKI ALIAS BATAGURKI URF SMT. LALITAWWA W/O SHIVAMURTHYAPPA GANIGER Vs MUTTAPPA S/O SHARANAPPA MUGALI ALIAS GANIGER ALIAS ARAMANI on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO 100510 OF 2022 BETWEEN 1 . SMT. AKKAMMA D/O HANUMAPPA BATAKURKI ALIAS BATAGURKI URF SMT. LALITAWWA W/O SHIVAMURTHYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD

DATED THIS 17th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

RFA NO 100510 OF 2022

BETWEEN

1 .

SMT. AKKAMMA D/O HANUMAPPA BATAKURKI ALIAS

BATAGURKI URF SMT. LALITAWWA W/O

SHIVAMURTHYAPPA GANIGER

AGE. 51 YEARS,

OCC. HOUSEHOLD,

R/O. PUTAGAON,

BADNI,

TQ. SHIRAHATTI,

NOW RESIDING AT BHUVIRAPUR,

TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI 581110.

AND OTHERS.

APPELLANT

(By Sri. : V G BHAT, Advocate )

AND

1 .

MUTTAPPA S/O SHARANAPPA MUGALI ALIAS

GANIGER ALIAS ARAMANI

AGE. 33 YEARS,

OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE,

R/O. NEAR VEERANARAYAN TEMPLE,

GADAG,

TQ. AND DSIT. GADAG 582102.

AND OTHERS.

... RESPONDENT

RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE

1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED

26.09.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.62/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE

ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG PARTLY DECREEING

THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

S Three weeks time is granted to comply with office objections. Otherwise, matter stands dismissed without reference to Court.

SD/- JUDGE

Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.12.2023. The advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at SI No.1 to 8. Hence, this RFA No. 100510/2022 stands dismissed without reference to Court as per the Court Order dated 17.11.2023.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

C- By:- rv T- By: -ran

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead