Karnataka High Court
WP/104902/2024 of KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD Vs SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER on 25 August 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13132 WP No. 104902 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104902 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 104902 OF 2024 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD
A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE
COMPANIES ACT 1956,
HAVING A REGISTERED OFFICE AT BELAPUR BHAVAN, SECTOR 11, CBD BELAPUR, NAVI MUMBAI 400614, REPRESENTED BY SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER, KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD, KARWAR, SHRI B.S. NADAGE, S/O. SURENDRA NADAGE, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, AT KARWAR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKESH M BILKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER
KONKAN RAILWAY AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KARWAR, KARWAR SUB DIVISION, AT KARWAR-581301.
2.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT,
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
AT KARWAR 581301.
3.
SHRI ANANDU MALLU NAIK (DEAD BY LRS)
R/O VILLAGE KOLGE, KARWAR 581317,
(SINCE DEAD, BUT NOT HAVING BROUGHT LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVES ON RECORD THE IMPUGNED
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3A.
3B.
3C.
3D.
AWARD REMAINS MADE IN FAVOR OF A DEAD
PERSON)
SMT BHAGIRATHI W/O ANANDU NAIK
AGED 76 YEARS
SRI SHAMBAJI S/O ANANDU NAIK
AGED 50 YEARS
SMT SUDHA D/O ANANDU NAIK
AGED 52 YEARS
SMT GEETA D/O ANANDU NAIK
AGED 40 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF ASNOTI,
KOLAGE, KARWAR 581317.
4.
4A.
4B.
4C.
4D.
4E.
4F.
SHRI TUKARAM MALLU NAIK
R/O. KOLGE KARWAR 581317,
SINCE DEAD, BUT NOT HAVING BROUGHT LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVES ON RECORD THE IMPUGNED
AWARD REMAINS MADE IN FAVOR OF A DEAD
PERSON.
SMT VANITA W/O TUKARAM NAIK
AGED 72 YEARS
SANDHYA D/O TUKARAM NAIK
AGED 50 YEARS
SMT ASHA D/O TUKARAM NAIK
AGED 47 YEARS
SRI ASHOK S/O TUKRAM NAIK
AGED 45 YEARS
SMT ROSHAN D/O TUKARAM NAIK
AGED 45 YEARS
SRI SANTOSH S/O TUKARAM NAIK
AGED 41 YEARS
HC-KAR
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF ASNOTI, KOLAGE,
KARWAR 581317.
5.
5A.
5B.
5C.
5D.
SRI. SHANTARAM MALLU NAIK
R/O. VILLAGE KOLGE, KARWAR,
SINCE DEAD BUT NOT HAVING BROUGHT LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVES ON RECORD THE INPUGNED
AWARD REMAINS MADE IN FAVOUR OF A DEAD
PERSON
SMT SUNITA W/O SHANTARAM NAIK
AGED 75 YEARS,
SRI SURAJ S/O SHANTARAM NAIK
AGED 41 YEARS,
SRI SUJAN S/O SHANTARAM NAIK
AGED 35 YEARS,
SRI SUCHITA D/O SHANTARAM NAIK
AGED 38 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF ASNOTI, KOLAGE,
KARWAR 581317.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I. DECLARING THAT THE
IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 17-06-2022 PASSED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.BHUSWA/ KR-VIVA-28(A)-99/2012- 13 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IS VITIATED AND NON-EST.II. QUASH
THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 17-06-2022 PASSED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.BHUSWA-KR-VIVA-28(A)-99/2012-13
VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND HAVING
VITIATED
AND
RENDERED
NON-EST
AND
WITHOUT
APPLICATION
OF
MIND.III.
QUASHING
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS IN LAC 28(A)-99/2012-13 ON THE FILE OF
RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AS ILLEGAL LAND
ARBITRARY AND ULTRA VIRES SECTION 28-A.IV. DECLARING
THAT IN THE EVENT OF RE-DETERMINATION UNDER SECTION
28-A, THE PETITIONER IS NOT LIABLE TO PAY ANY INTEREST IN
HC-KAR
RESPECT OF THE RE-DETERMINED AMOUNT OR COMPENSATION.
V. ISSUE ANY APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS
HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM Ct:pa List No.: 3 Sl No.: 88