Karnataka High Court

WP/104444/2024 of KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD Vs SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2025:KHC-D:13565 WP No. 104444 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104444 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

WRIT PETITION NO. 104444 OF 2024 (LA-RES)

BETWEEN:

KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD

A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT

BELAPUR BHAVAN SECTOR 11

CBD BELAPUR, NAVI MUMBAI 400614

REPRESENTED BY SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER, KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD. KARWAR

SHRI. B.S. NADAGE,

S/O. SURENDRA NADAGE,

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, AT KARWAR.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAKESH M BILKI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

KONKAN RAILWAY AND

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

KARWAR SUB-DIVISION

AT KARWAR-581301.

2.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

AT KARWAR-581301.

SRI NARASIMHA S/O. RAMACHANDRA PADTI BY LRS,

3.

SMT. NAYANA NARASIMHA PADTI

4.

SRI. ASHOK RAMACHANDRA PADTI

5.

SRI. SUBHASH RAMACHANDRA PADTI

Digitally signed

by SHWETHA

RAGHAVENDRA

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

6.

SRI. KRISHNANAND RAMACHANDRA PADTI

7.

SRI. JAGADISH RAMACHANDRA PADTI

ALL R/A AMADALLI,

KARWAR TALUK-581324.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO:

I)

QUASH THE AWARD DATED 22-03-2022 PASSED BY THE

RESPONDENT NO.1 IN BHUSWA:KR-VIVA 28(A)-02/2012-13

VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS ARIBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND HAVING

VITIATED

AND

RENDERED

NON-EST

AND

WITHOUT

APPLICATION OF MIND.

II)

DECLARING THAT, THE AWARD IN BHUSWA:KR-VIVA 28(A)- 02/2012-13 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE

ANNEXURE-A AS VITIATED AND NON-EST ON ACCOUNT OF

THE ENORMOUS DELAY IN DECIDING THE APPLICATION

UNDER SECTION 28(A).

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Despite the order dated 15.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.

HC-KAR

2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.

3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

GAB CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 47

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead