Karnataka High Court

RSA/100819/2025 of SHRI. RAMAPPA S/O MALLAPPA BHAVI Vs SMT AMEENABEE W/O KHAJAVALI on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

100819/2025 (SP) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD [SHRI. RAMAPPA S/O MALLAPPA BHAVI VS. SMT AMEENABEE W/O KHAJAVALI AND ANOTHER] 07.01.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL ORAL ORDER Case is called out. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is

RSA NO. 100819/2025 (SP)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD

[SHRI. RAMAPPA S/O MALLAPPA BHAVI VS. SMT AMEENABEE

W/O KHAJAVALI AND ANOTHER]

07.01.2026

(VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)

CORAM:

ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Case is called out.

The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent.

As per Order dated : 13.11.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections.

But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 13.11.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied.

The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter.

As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended.

As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject.

- 2 - RSA NO. 100819/2025 (SP)

Hence, the following Order is passed by exercising the powers as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules.

ORDER

The Memorandum of Regular Second Appeal filed by the Appellant under Sec. 100 of Civil Procedure Code is dismissed for non-compliance of the office objections, with no order as to costs.

The Appellant is entitled to apply for setting aside this Order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959.

Sd/- (JERALD RUDOLPH MENDONCA) ADDL. REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) & NOMIATED REGISTRAR

List No.: 56 Sl No.: 114

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead