Karnataka High Court
WP/105477/2024 of THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC Vs RAMAPPA S/O DAREPPA HARIJAN on 11 August 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13576 WP No. 105477 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105477 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DIVISION, BAGALKOT,
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13576
WP No. 105477 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 105477 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DIVISION,
BAGALKOT, DIST. BAGALKOT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RAMAPPA S/O. DAREPPA HARIJAN,
AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED DRIVER,
R/O. NEAR GANAPATHI TEMPLE,
AT AND POST: TODALBAGI,
TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT-570121.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 05/12/2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT IN APPLICATION NO.1/2021
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13576
WP No. 105477 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 09.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GAB /CT-AN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 58