Karnataka High Court
WP/101922/2024 of SHRI BADARINATH S PATIL Vs UNION OF INDIA on 11 August 2026
2024:KHC-D:13933 WP No. 101922 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101922 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN: SHRI. BADARINATH.S.PATIL, S.S.BILAGI, 7TH CROSS, KALYAN NAGAR, DHARWAD,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 101922 OF 2024 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. BADARINATH.S.PATIL,
S.S.BILAGI, 7TH CROSS,
KALYAN NAGAR, DHARWAD,
KARNATAKA-580 007,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H.R.KAMBIYAVAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY THE FINANCE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2.
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
3.
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1),
C.R.BUILDING, NAVANAGAR,
HUBBALLI, KARNATAKA-580 025.
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN
RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Sri.H.R.Kambiyavar., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person.
Counsel seeks short accommodation to comply with the office objections.
This court is not inclined to grant further time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 10.09.2024, on that day, finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 26.09.2024. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The petitioner has not respected the Court order. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the
petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21