Karnataka High Court
MFA/101396/2017 of SMT. NAJAMUNISA MADARSAB MANNUR, Vs BELAGAVI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, on 1 August 2026
2024:KHC-D:17607 MFA No. 101396 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101396/2017 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAJAMUNISA MADARSAB MANNUR, SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101396/2017 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NAJAMUNISA MADARSAB MANNUR,
SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HER
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1A.
SMT. PARVIN MANSUR DEVALAPUR,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: HIREBAGEWADI,
TALUK AND DISTRICT BELAGAVI.
1B.
SRI MOHAMMED ALI MADARSAB MANNUR,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
OCC: SERVICE, R/O: TANAJI GALLI, MAJAGAON, TALUK AND DISTRICT BELAGAVI.
1C.
SRI AIJAZ MADARSAB MANNUR,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE,
R/O: HO. NO. 243, TANAJI GALLI, MAJAGAON, TALUK AND DISTRICT BELAGAVI.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI Y. LAKSHMIKANT REDDY AND
SRI Y. MALATHI REDDY, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER,
BELAGAVI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
BELAGAVI – 590 019.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LAND
ACQUISITION
ACT,
1894,
PRAYING
TO,
AWARDING
A
COMPENSATION OF RS.97,000/- PER GUNTA IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND MODIFY THE
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
Location: High
Court of Karnataka
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.04.2016 PASSED IN LAC 26/2012
BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BELAGAVI AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
1
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)
The above appeal was listed on 16.10.2017, 22.01.2018, 02.08.2019, 29.11.2019, 07.04.2021, 19.07.2022 and 05.12.2023 for compliance of office objections. However, the office objections have not been complied.
2. This Court vide order dated 19.07.2022 granted a week’s time to comply with the office objections, failing which, the matter was ordered to be listed for dismissal. However, vide order dated 05.12.2023, this Court granted one week time to comply with the office objections. Till date office objections have not been complied with. Hence, the above matter has been listed this day.
3. Even today, the matter was passed over in the morning session and the learned counsel was permitted to comply with the office objections and the matter was called in
the afternoon session. However, the office objections have not been complied with.
4. Having regard to the order dated 19.07.2022, the above appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PMP/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2