Karnataka High Court
MFA/101437/2021 of SMT. GEETHA BAI W/O. LATE GIRISH NAIK Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 August 2026
COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101437 OF 2021 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GEETHA BHAI W/O LATE GIRISH NAIK, AGED: 30 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101437 OF 2021 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. GEETHA BHAI W/O LATE GIRISH NAIK, AGED: 30 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.
2. KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR S/O LATE GIRISH NAIK, AGED: 6 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.
SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY
HIS MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN
SMT. GEETHA BHAI W/O LATE GIRISH NAIK.
3. SRI. AMBRA NAIK S/O LATE BHEEMA NAIK, AGE: 69 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.
4. SMT. MAKKAVVA @ BUDDI W/O AMBRA NAIK, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TQ: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. C.V.ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BALLARI- 583102.
2. SRI. R. HEMA REDDY S/O REDDY KOTRAPPA, AGE: 40 YEARS, R/O: SECTION OFFICER, GESCOM HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI- 583212.
3. SRI. N. MAHESH S/O MALLAPPA,
AGE: 39 YEARS, R/O: LINEMAN GESCOM,
HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI,
DIST: BALLARI- 583212.
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
(ELECTRICAL) GESCOM,
HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI,
DIST: BALLARI- 583212.
5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENIGNEER,
(ELECTRICAL) GESCOM,
HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI,
DIST: BALLARI- 583212.
…RESPONDENTS
* * * * *
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Order 33 Rule(1) R/w section 151 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and order dated 30TH DAY OF
MARCH 2019 passed in MISC. No.11/2018 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, H.B.Halli, Itinerary sitting at Senior Civil Judge, Huvinahadagali.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the following;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Four weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE.
//COPY//
As per the endorsement made in the Order Sheet dated 10.01.2024, the Advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.101437/2021 stands dismissed as per the Court Order dated 18.11.2023. BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: gtb
C- By: raj