Karnataka High Court

MFA/101437/2021 of SMT. GEETHA BAI W/O. LATE GIRISH NAIK Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101437 OF 2021 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GEETHA BHAI W/O LATE GIRISH NAIK, AGED: 30 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023

BEFORE

THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101437 OF 2021 (CPC)

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. GEETHA BHAI W/O LATE GIRISH NAIK, AGED: 30 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.

2. KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR S/O LATE GIRISH NAIK, AGED: 6 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.

SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY

HIS MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN

SMT. GEETHA BHAI W/O LATE GIRISH NAIK.

3. SRI. AMBRA NAIK S/O LATE BHEEMA NAIK, AGE: 69 YEARS, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TAL: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.

4. SMT. MAKKAVVA @ BUDDI W/O AMBRA NAIK, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: BHEETHYA THANDA, TQ: HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI- 583219.

...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. C.V.ANGADI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

BALLARI- 583102.

2. SRI. R. HEMA REDDY S/O REDDY KOTRAPPA, AGE: 40 YEARS, R/O: SECTION OFFICER, GESCOM HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI- 583212.

3. SRI. N. MAHESH S/O MALLAPPA,

AGE: 39 YEARS, R/O: LINEMAN GESCOM,

HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI,

DIST: BALLARI- 583212.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

(ELECTRICAL) GESCOM,

HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI,

DIST: BALLARI- 583212.

5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENIGNEER,

(ELECTRICAL) GESCOM,

HAMPASAGAR, TAL: H.B. HALLI,

DIST: BALLARI- 583212.

…RESPONDENTS

* * * * *

This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Order 33 Rule(1) R/w section 151 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and order dated 30TH DAY OF

MARCH 2019 passed in MISC. No.11/2018 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, H.B.Halli, Itinerary sitting at Senior Civil Judge, Huvinahadagali.

This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the following;

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Four weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE.

//COPY//

As per the endorsement made in the Order Sheet dated 10.01.2024, the Advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.101437/2021 stands dismissed as per the Court Order dated 18.11.2023. BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: gtb

C- By: raj

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead