Karnataka High Court
WP/103873/2024 of M/S BHAGIRATH TRADERS Vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER on 28 July 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13115 WP No. 103873 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103873 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. BHAGIRATH TRADERS NO. 57, CHIKBAGANAL-583231, TK. AND DIST:
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13115
WP No. 103873 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 103873 OF 2024 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. BHAGIRATH TRADERS
NO. 57, CHIKBAGANAL-583231,
TK. AND DIST: KOPPAL,
REP. BY ITS PROP.,
SRI. MANJUNATH
S/O. GONEPPAGOUDA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
GSTIN. 29AZXPM8812A1ZX.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H.R.KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
(AUDIT-1), 2ND CROSS, NEHARU COLONY,
HOSPETE-583203, DIST: BALLARI.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
FINANCE SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560001.
3.
UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE),
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHARAD MAGADUM, AGA FOR R2)
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13115
WP No. 103873 of 2024
THIS WRIT IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF
CERTIORARI OR IN THE LIKE NATURE OF CERTIORARI
QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO. CTO (AUDIT)- 1/HPT/GST.S-73(ORDER)/2023/24/T-785 DATED 31-12-2023, PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM Ct-vh List No.: 3 Sl No.: 67