Karnataka High Court
WP/104084/2024 of THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC, Vs SRI. RAMALINGAPPA S/O. VENKAPPA KOKATNUR, on 23 July 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13531 WP No. 104084 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104084 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: 1. THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC, CHIKODI DIVISION, R/BY: ITS
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13531
WP No. 104084 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 104084 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC,
CHIKODI DIVISION,
R/BY: ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
NWKRTC, CHIKODI DIVISION, CHIKODI.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC
BAGALKOT DIVISION, BAGALKOT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S.HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. RAMALINGAPPA
S/O. VENKAPPA KOKATNUR,
AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O. ARJUNAGI, TQ: VIJAPUR,
DIST: VIJAYAPUR-571021.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER
DATED 31/03/2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND
SESSION JUDGE, BAGALKOT, IN APPLICATION NO.04/2018
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13531
WP No. 104084 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 09.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GAB CT:VP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43