Karnataka High Court
WP/103968/2024 of THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC Vs SRI MAHANTESH S/O GURUSANGAPPA ANGADI on 15 July 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13118 WP No. 103968 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103968 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC GADAG DIVISION, DIST. GADAG.
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13118
WP No. 103968 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 103968 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC
GADAG DIVISION,
DIST. GADAG.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI MAHANTESH S/O GURUSANGAPPA ANGADI,
AGE 37 YEARS, OCC. NIL,
R/O AT POST. BEVOOR,
TQ AND DIST. BAGALKOT 570121.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR
DIRECTION QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED. 31-03- 2017 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT
HUBBALLI AT HUBBALLI IN KID NO. 144/2014 THE COPY OF THE
SAID IMPUGNED ORDER IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
Digitally signed by
ASHPAK
KASHIMSA
MALAGALADINNI
Location: High
Court of Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench,
Dharwad
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13118
WP No. 103968 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioners is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM/CT:PA List No.: 3 Sl No.: 70