Karnataka High Court
WP/102957/2015 of THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC Vs CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SURESH BHOSLE on 14 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WP NO 102957 OF 2015 [L-KSRTC] BETWEEN THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC CHIKKODI DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, CHIKKODI THE PETTIIOENR IS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
WP NO 102957 OF 2015 [L-KSRTC]
BETWEEN
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC
CHIKKODI DIVISION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, CHIKKODI
THE PETTIIOENR IS REPRESENTED BY
ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER
NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE
HUBBALLI
... PETITIONER
(By Sri./Smt : SHIVAKUMAR S BADAWADAGI,
ADVOCATE)
AND
CHANDRASHEKAR
S/O SURESH BHOSLE
AGE:34 YEARS, OCC. NIL
R/O BALAJI PARK,
NEAR RR PATIL GARAGE, UJALAVADI
TQ. KARAVEER,
DIST. KHOLAPUR (MAHARASHTRA)
... RESPONDENT
This WP is filed under article 226 & 227 of constitution of India, 1950
praying to quash the award dated: 27.01.2012, passed by the Additional Labour Court, Hubballi in kid. no. 159/2011, the copy of the same is produced and marked as annexure-B to the writ petition and consequently be pleased to dismiss the kid. no. 159/2011 filed by the respondent on the file of Additional Labour Court, Hubballi and etc...
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court, made the following.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
“Six weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed automatically, without further reference to the Court.” Sd/- JUDGE
Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.02.2016 the Advocate for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No. 102957/2015 stands dismissed, as per the Court Order dated: 30/11/2015.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By :- afh R- By:-
C- By:-