Karnataka High Court
WP/107030/2024 of SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O BASAVANTRAO SUBHEDAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 July 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13389 WP No. 107030 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107030 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O BASAVANTRAO SUBHEDAR AGE. 67 YEARS, OCC.
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13389
WP No. 107030 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 107030 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHAKUNTALA
W/O BASAVANTRAO SUBHEDAR
AGE. 67 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD, R/O YARAGATTI, TQ. YARAGATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591129.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKESH S. HATTIKATAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001.
2.
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
DHARWAD DISTRICT, DHARWAD 580001.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR,
DHARWAD DISTRICT, DHARWAD 580001.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR,
ALNAVAR, DISTRICT DHARWAD 581103.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN
NATURE OF MANDAMUS ISSUING DIRECTIONS OR AN APPROPRIATE
ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER
AND ALLOW HER APPLICATIONS DATED 29-04-2022 AND 14-05-2024
VIDE ANNEXURE- & ETC.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS
MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13389
WP No. 107030 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 127