Karnataka High Court
RSA/433/2008 of SMT MEHABOOBI Vs MAKBOOLSAB on 3 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.433 OF 2008 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT.MEHABOOBI, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O AHAMEDSAB MANSOOR, OCC:AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O AKKI-ALUR,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.433 OF 2008 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT.MEHABOOBI,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
W/O AHAMEDSAB MANSOOR,
OCC:AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O AKKI-ALUR,
TALUK HANAGAL,
HAVERI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
[BY SRI S.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
MAKBOOLSAB
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
S/O ABDULKHADARSAB SAVIKERI,
R/O AKKI-ALUR,
TALUK HANAGAL,
HAVERI DISTRICT – 581 110
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI M.M.MALAGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF CPC, CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
21.11.2007 PASSED BY THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, HAVERI IN R.A.NO.11/2007, RESTORE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 01.02.2007 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE
(SR.DN.) AND JMFC IN O.S.NO.726/2002.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of appellant. The captioned appeal is listed in until disposal list. On 02.11.2022, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of appellant. Today also there is no representation on behalf of appellant. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2008. Now we are in the month of November 2022. The appeal is pending for almost fourteen years. As already noted above, though matter was called yesterday and today, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE TKN