Karnataka High Court
RSA/5806/2010 of KALAVEERAPPA S/O.VEERAPPA ANTARAGOLI, Vs SHIVARUDRAGOUDA KARABASAGOUDAD PATIL, on 3 July 2026
COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD Dated this on the 14th day of February 2012 Before THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL R.S.A. No.5806 OF 2010 BETWEEN KALAVEERAPPA S/O.VEERAPPA ANTARAGOLI, AGE:MAJOR, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O.INCHANGI, TQ:SAVANUR, BY HIS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD
Dated this on the 14th day of February 2012
Before
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL
R.S.A. No.5806 OF 2010
BETWEEN
KALAVEERAPPA S/O.VEERAPPA ANTARAGOLI,
AGE:MAJOR, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O.INCHANGI, TQ:SAVANUR, BY HIS SPECIAL
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHEKAPPA
S/O.VEERAPPA ANTARAGOLI – 581 193.
... APPELLANT
(By Sri.M/S GOULAY ASSOCIATES, ADV.)
AND
1.
SHIVARUDRAGOUDA KARABASAGOUDAD PATIL,
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O.ICHANGI TQ:SAVANUR, DIST:HAVERI – 581 193.
2.
CHANAVEERAGOUDA KARABASAGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O.ICHANGI TQ:SAVANUR, DIST:HAVERI – 581 193.
3.
GRAM PANCHAYAT ICHANGI, REP BY ITS
SECRETARY,
R/O.ICHANGI TQ:SAVANUR, DIST:HAVERI – 581 193.
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri.M V HIREMATH&V S KALASURMATH, ADV. for C/R)
****
This Regular Second Appeal filed U/s 100 of CPC, against the Judgment and Decree dated 25/06/2010 passed in RA No.41/2007 on the file of the Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Haveri, dismissing the appeal filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 24/3/07
and
the
decree
passed
in
OS.No.78/2005
on
the
file
of
the
Addl.Civil
Judge(Jr.Dn)JMFC, Savanur.
This appeal coming on for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections, this day the Court delivered the following;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
One week time is granted finally to remove the office objections. If office objections are not removed within one week from today, the appeal filed by the appellant stands dismissed for non-prosecution without reference to the court. SD/- JUDGE.
As per the endorsement dated 26/3/12 made in the Order Sheet, the Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence this RSA No.5806/2010 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 14/2/2012. BY ORDER Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:- C- By:- T- By:- Sr. Seal