Karnataka High Court
RSA/100467/2022 of KANCHANMALA D/O RANGANAGOUDA PTIL Vs KESARI PRASAD S/O RAMCHANDRA PRASAD SUBEDAR on 2 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA RSA NO. 100467 OF 2022 BETWEEN: KANCHANMALA D/O RANGANAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: KATAGERI, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587201 REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
RSA NO. 100467 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
KANCHANMALA D/O RANGANAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE,
R/O: KATAGERI, TQ: BADAMI,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587201
REPRESENTED BY HER
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
SHRI. RANGAPPA
S/O SHESHAGIRAPPA NEELREDDY
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE,
R/O: KATAGERI, TQ: BADAMI,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587201
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADV. FOR APPELLANT)
AND
1 .
KESARI PRASAD S/O RAMCHANDRA PRASAD SUBEDAR
AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: ARBAN GALLI, NARAGUND,
TQ: NARAGUND, DIST: GADAG
2 .
SHRI. NARASHIMHAPRASAD SUBEDAR
AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: ARBAN GALLI, NARAGUND
DIST: GADAG
3 .
DR. GOUDAPPA GOUDA
S/O KALKAPPA BADRAGOUDA
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR,
R/O: ARBAN GALLI, NARAGUND,
TQ: NARAGUND, DIST: GADAG
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.01.2021 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.191/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, GADAG, DISMISSING
THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 15.10.2019, PASSED IN O.S. NO.37/2011 ON THE FILE OF
THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, NARAGUND, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC
PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
“Having regard to the order dated 05.04.2024, the above appeal is required to be dismissed. However, as a final opportunity, one week time is granted to comply with the office objections, subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to the Advocates Library Fund, High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad, making it clear that if the office objections are not complied with and the cost is not paid within one week, the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court.”
SD/- JUDGE
//COPY// Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 27/08/2024. Counsel for the appellant has not complied with the office objection at Sl. No. 3(a) and has not filed the memo a/w acknowledgment for having paid the cost. Hence, this RSA No. 100467/2022 stand dismissed without further orders from this Court as per the Court Order dated 22.07.2024. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:-
C- By:-jm T- By: - cnb