Karnataka High Court
RFA/100018/2020 of SHIVANAND S/O.MAHADEVAPPA TADKOD Vs MRUTUNJAYA S/O. BASAPPA HUMBERI on 1 July 2026
2024:KHC-D:1526-DB RFA No. 100018 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100018 OF 2020 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SHIVANAND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100018 OF 2020 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1.
SHIVANAND S/O.MAHADEVAPPA TADKOD,
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. HOSA ONI, PUDAKALAKATTI,
TQ: DIST: DHARWAD.
2.
YELLAPPA S/O. MAHADEVAPPA TADKOD,
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. HOSA ONI, PUDAKALAKATTI,
TQ: DIST: DHARWAD.
3.
BASAPPA S/O. MAHADEVAPPA TADKOD,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. HOSA ONI, PUDAKALAKATTI,
TQ: DIST: DHARWAD.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. V. G. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MRUTUNJAYA S/O. BASAPPA HUMBERI
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. GALI ONI, HEBBALLI AGASI,
MANGALWAR PETH, DHARWAD.
2.
UMA W/O. LATE SHIVANANDAGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. SANGOLLI RAYANNA NAGAR,
TEJASWINI NAGAR, DHARWAD-04.
3.
NEELAVVA W/O. BASAPPA HUMBERI,
AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,,
R/O. GALI ONI, HEBBALLI AGASI,
MANGALWAR PETH, DHARWAD.
4.
BASAPPA S/O. RUDRAPPA HUMBERI,
AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOTEL BUSINESS,
R/O. MANAGUNDI, TQ: DIST: DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRAKASH S. UDIKERI, ADV. FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.4 SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 READ WITH ORDER 41
RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 21/12/2019 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M DHARWAD IN O.S. NO.128/2015
AND ETC.
THIS
APPEAL,
COMING
ON
FOR ORDERS,
THIS
DAY,
S G PANDIT, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
1
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellants.
2. Paper book as directed, not filed. This Court on 20.12.2023 passed the following order: “The appellants’ counsel is absent and this Court vide order dated 31.07.2023 granted eight weeks’ time and after that, first time the matter has been listed. Hence, another two weeks’ time is granted to file paper book.
If paper book is not filed within two weeks, list this matter for dismissal immediately after winter vacation 2023.” Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non-filing of paper book.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
RKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24