Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/104888/2025 of MR UMESH S/O SHIVAPPA MADAR ALIAS JANGAWAD Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 16 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:1952 CRL.P No. 104888 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104888 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MR. UMESH S/O SHIVAPPA MADAR @ JANGAWAD AGE.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104888 OF 2025
(439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. UMESH S/O SHIVAPPA MADAR @ JANGAWAD
AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. SULLIKER VILLAGE,
TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587101.
2.
MR. VITTAL S/O SHIVAPPA MADAR @ JANGAWAD
AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. SULLIKERI VILLAGE,
TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587101.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ROHIT NAGESH LATUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
R/BY KERUR P S
TQ/DIST. BAGALKOTE 587206
R/BY HCGP , HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD
BENCH, DHARWAD-587101.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF
BNSS, PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 AND 6
ON REGULAR BAIL IN RELATION TO KERUR PS CR NO. 125/2020
PENDING ON THE FILE BEFORE THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BAGALKOTE IN S C NO. 28/2021 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES
HC-KAR
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 143, 147, 148, 341, 447, 302, 109 R/W
34 IPC, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. None appears for the petitioners.
2. Even on the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
3. Order sheet discloses that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently. This Court adjourned the matter to 23.01.2026, as a last chance, in the interest of justice.
4. Again on 23.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was listed to 06.02.2018. On which date also there was no representation.
5. Taking note of the same, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
HC-KAR
6. However, dismissal of the bail petition shall not come in the way of petitioners seeking for filing successive bail requests.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8