Karnataka High Court
MFA/103025/2015 of MALLIKARJUN BASAVANTAPPA HOSAMANI Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BAILHONGAL on 5 June 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR M.F.A. No.103025/2015 (LAC) BETWEEN MALLIKARJUN BASAVANTAPPA HOSAMANI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SATTIGERI VILLAGE, TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI. .....
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR
M.F.A. No.103025/2015 (LAC)
BETWEEN
MALLIKARJUN BASAVANTAPPA HOSAMANI,
AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: SATTIGERI VILLAGE,
TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
..... APPELLANT
(BY SRI BASAVARAJ BYAKOD, ADV.)
AND
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BAILHONGAL SUB-DIVISION,
BAILHONGAL.
2.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
MINOR IRRIGATION,
DAK BUNGALOW, SHAHAPUR,
BELAGAVI.
3.
THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
NORTH ZONE, MINOR IRRIGATION,
VIJAYAPURA, TQ & DIST:VIJAYAPURA.
..... RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.54(1) OF LA ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.02.2006 PASSED IN LAC.
NO.280/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.)
: 2 :
SAUNDATTI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION
FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that in claim petition filed before the reference Court, the claimant had sought compensation at the rate Rs.3,00,000/- per acre.
2. The subject matter of the appeal is less than Rs.10.00 lakhs and the same is not maintainable before this Court, in view of provisions of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964. The Registry is directed to return the original papers to the counsel for the appellant, after taking photocopies of the same along with the quantum of court fee permitted to be refunded. Six weeks time is granted to the appellant to re-present the same before the jurisdictional District Court. Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
: 3 :
3. In view of the disposal of the appeal, I.A.No.2/2015 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is rejected. However, it is open for the appellant to move before the appellate Court. Sd/- JUDGE Naa