Karnataka High Court
WP/113848/2019 of THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC Vs SHRI.IRAYYA PANCHAKSHARAYYA HIREMATH on 4 June 2026
No. 113848 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 113848 OF 2019 (L-ID) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC CHIKKODI DIVISION, RETD.BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, GADAG DIVISION, GADAG.
WP No. 113848 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 113848 OF 2019 (L-ID)
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC
CHIKKODI DIVISION,
RETD.BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
GADAG DIVISION, GADAG.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI.IRAYYA PANCHAKSHARAYYA HIREMATH
R/O: MAHAJANA PLOT,
NO.49, BASAVANAGAR,
TQ : ATHANI, DIST : BELAGAVI.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO:- ISSUE A WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER INCLUDING THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI
QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 29/09/2016 PASSED IN
APPLICATION NO.41/2014 BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, BELAGAVI COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS
ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
Digitally
signed
by John
Doe
WP No. 113848 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
On 09.03.2020 the following order was passed: “The petitioner shall comply with the office objections within a period of two weeks from today, subject to the condition that if the office objections are not complied within such period, the petition shall be listed for dismissal for default.”
Till today office objections have not been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also absent.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE
SSP