Karnataka High Court
WP/103931/2024 of THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC Vs VENKATESH S/O SHANKAR NAIK on 25 April 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13358 WP No. 103931 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103931 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC R/BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, SIRSI,
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13358
WP No. 103931 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 103931 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC
R/BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
SIRSI, DIST: SIRSI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S.HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
VENKATESH S/O. SHANKAR NAIK
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. KUDRIGI VILLAGE, TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581021.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
08.01.2024 PASSED BY THE LABOUR COURT, AND THE PRL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE UTTARA KANNADA KARWAR IN
KID (REF) NO.7/2016 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13358
WP No. 103931 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 92