Karnataka High Court
CCC/100380/2024 of SMT RUPASHREE MANE Vs SMT JAYASHREE SHINTRI K A S on 23 April 2026
NC: 2025:KHC-D:10879-DB CCC No. 100380 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100380 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100380 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. RUPASHREE MANE,
D/O. LATE KIRAN ANAPPA PUJERI,
AGE: 41 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. SHINDI KORBET,
TQ. GOKAK,
BELAGAVI-591310.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. PRASHANT F. GOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. JAYASHREE SHINTRI, K.A.S,
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER,
OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION,
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench
HC-KAR
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
RODDA RASTE, DHARWAD-580008.
…ACCUSED
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
R/BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY EDUCATION,
2ND GATE, 6TH FLOOR,
M. S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560001.
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. V. S. KALASURMATH, AGA)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE
ACCUSED/RESPONDENT FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER
DATED 18.09.2024 IN WP NO.105399/2024 (S-RES) VIDE
ANNEXURE-A, PASSED BY THE HON’BLE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AND
ALSO AWARD COST OF THIS PROCEEDINGS IN THE ENDS OF
JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) The contempt proceedings are initiated as regards the alleged disobedience of direction passed in WP No.105399/2024.
2. It is noticed that as against the order passed in the said writ petition, the appeal was filed and the same came to be disposed off as per order dated 19.08.2025, whereby the time has been granted to the State to comply with the order passed in WP No.105399/2024, while modifying the order of learned Single Judge as regards certain aspects.
3. In light of the order passed in W.A.No.100200/2025, granting time for compliance, the present contempt proceedings are dropped. Liberty is reserved to revive the contempt in the event of any violation of direction in the writ appeal to take appropriate steps. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE RKM /CT-AN