Karnataka High Court
CP/100047/2024 of SMT VIDYA CHINNAKAR W/O SATYANARAYAN CHINNAKAR Vs SATYANARAYAN S/O VENKANNA ALIAS VENKATESH CHINNAKAR on 7 April 2026
2025:KHC-D:498 CP No. 100047 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL PETITION NO. 100047 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN: SMT. VIDYA CHINNAKAR W/O. SATYANARAYAN CHINNAKAR, AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD
NC: 2025:KHC-D:498
CP No. 100047 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
CIVIL PETITION NO. 100047 OF 2024 (-)
BETWEEN:
SMT. VIDYA CHINNAKAR
W/O. SATYANARAYAN CHINNAKAR,
AGE. 30 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. WARD NO.10,
NEAR DURGA VIHAR,
TQ & DIST: BAGALKOT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VASANT.G.HOLEYANNAVAR, SRI. VIDYADHAR B. HUGGI
AND SMT. SHRIDEVI. B. ALBA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
SRI. SATYANARAYAN
S/O. VENKANNA CHINNAKAR,
AGE. 38 YEARS,
OCC. DAR POLICE,
R/O. H.NO. 75/2 G.G. HOSPITAL ROAD,
NEAR S.P. OFFICE, POLICE COLONY,
KALABURAGI – 585105.
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT - SERVED)
THIS CP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CIVIL
PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND TRANSFER
THE M.C.NO.409/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE PRL. JUDGE, ADDL.
FAMILY COURT AT KALABURAGI FILED BY THE RESPONDENT, TO THE
COURT OF PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BAGALKOTE, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2025:KHC-D:498
CP No. 100047 of 2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
As per order dated 21.11.2024, cost for Rs.1000/- is also not deposited till day for recalling the order dated 08.11.2024, wherein the petition was dismissed for default. This shows the petitioners are interested to pursue the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8