Karnataka High Court
MFA/101136/2017 of SUSHILA W/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR Vs SHIVANAND S/O YALLAPPA DAYENNAVAR on 2 April 2026
COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL M.F.A.No.101136 OF 2017 (MV) BETWEEN: 1. SUSHILA W/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:35 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI 2. KUMARI LAXMI D/O BHARMAPPA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH.
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL
M.F.A.No.101136 OF 2017 (MV)
BETWEEN:
1.
SUSHILA W/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR
AGE:35 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE
R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK
DIST:BELAGAVI
2.
KUMARI LAXMI D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR
AGE:23 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE,
R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK
DIST:BELAGAVI.
3.
KUMARI SAVITA D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR
AGE:21 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE
R/O:PANJANATTI
TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI.
4.
KUMARI. KAVITA D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR
AGE:19 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE
R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK
DIST:BELAGAVI.
5.
KUMARI D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR
AGE:17 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE
R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK
DIST:BELAGAVI.
6.
KUMARI RAJASRI D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR
AGE:15 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE
R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK
DIST:BELAGAVI.
APPELLANT NO. 5 AND 6 ARE MINORS
REP BY MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. BAHUBALI.N.KANABARGI, ADVOCATE)
2
A N D:
1.
SHIVANAND S/O YALLAPPA DAYENNAVAR
AGE:MAJOR, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:MOHAREI, TAL:BAILHONGAL,
DIST:BELAGAVI.
2.
THE MANAGER
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD
FIRST FLOOR, PRABHU BUILDING
1 RAMDEV GALLI, BELGAVI.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.04.2014 PASSED IN
MVC NO.2116/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING
OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-I AND MEMBER, ADDITIONAL
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Though this Court passed a peremptory order on 09.10.2017 granting a week’s time to comply the office objections, as per the office endorsement, the office objections have not been complied till today.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE RHR/-