Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/100162/2026 of K J SANTOSH KUMAR S/O K JAYANNA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2676 CRL.P No. 100162 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100162 OF 2026 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: K.J. SANTOSH KUMAR S/O K. JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 41

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2676

CRL.P No. 100162 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100162 OF 2026

(439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))

BETWEEN:

K.J. SANTOSH KUMAR S/O K. JAYANNA

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

R/O. BASAVESHWARA NAGARA,

NEAR DARABENDRE SCHOOL, KOTTUR TOWN KUDLIGI, VIJAYANAGARA 583 135.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. R.M. JAVED, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

THROUGH KOTTUR P S., VIJAYANAGAR,

REP. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

BENCH AT DHARWAD 580001.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF

CR.P.C. (U/S. 483 OF BNSS, 2023) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS

PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN

CONNECTION

WITH

KUTTUR

P.S

CRIME

NO.190/2025

(NOW

CC.NO.1218/2025)

FOR

THE

ALLEGED

OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE

U/S.85, 108, 3(5) OF BNS, PENDING FILE BEFORE CIVIL JUDGE (SR

DN) AND JMFC, KUDLIGI, AND ETC.,.

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2676

CRL.P No. 100162 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.

The memo reads as under: "The counsel for petitioner most humbly submits that the family members of petitioner have instructed him not to prosecute the above petition and withdraw the same since they are not intending to prosecute the matter as of now. Hence kindly permit the petitioner to withdraw the same, in the interest of justice.”

Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 15

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead