Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/103596/2025 of SRI DEEPAK RAMACHANDRA ANVEKAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2587 CRL.P No. 103596 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103596 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI DEEPAK RAMACHANDRA ANVEKAR AGE. 64 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103596 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI DEEPAK RAMACHANDRA ANVEKAR
AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. GOLDSMITH
R/O. BEHIND DURGADEVI TEMPLE
BAAD, TQ. KARWAR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA.
2.
SRI RAVIKUMAR S/O CHANDRAKANTH
AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE
R/O. KESHNAIKWADA, KODIBHAG,
TQ. KARWAR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S.B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH KARAWAR TOWN PS
SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING
DHARWAD-580011.
2.
SHRI VIVEKANAND YASHWANTH BAIKERIKAR
AGE. 73 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS
R/O. SONARWADA,
BAAD NANDANAGADDA KARWAR,
TQ. KARWAR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581301.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE CRIMINAL PETITION BE QUASHING
THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
HC-KAR
NO.1 AND 2 IN CC NO.1184/2025 ARISING OUT OF KARAWR TOWN
P.S. CRIME NO. 09/2025 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR
THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION U/SEC 115(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 131 OF BNS ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM KARWAR, IN SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IS CONCERNED, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
The memo reads as under: "Herein the Advocate for the Petitioner begs to submit as under: That in the above case, the petitioners have challenged the FIR and complaint filed by the respondent No.1 with instigation of respondent No.2 bearing in C.C.No.1184/2025 arising in Karwar Town P.S. Crime No.09/2025 registered by the respondent No.1 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 115(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 131 of BNS Act pending on the file of Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM Karwad. After filing of the petition the petitioner is not interested to proceed with matter therefore the above case
HC-KAR
may kindly be permitted withdraw as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity.”
Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18