Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/103367/2023 of ASPAK S/O. GANISAB NALABAND Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2578 CRL.P No. 103367 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103367 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: ASPAK S/O. GANISAB NALABAND AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2578
CRL.P No. 103367 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103367 OF 2023
(482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
ASPAK S/O. GANISAB NALABAND
AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
R/O. GUTTAL VILLAGE, TALUK, HAVERI,
DIST. HAVERI, NEAR BUS STAND ROAD-581110.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD AND SRI. PRAKASH R. BADIGER, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
PSI GUTAL
R/BY. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD-580011.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF
REGISTERING THE CRIMINAL CASE IN CC NO.05/2023 (GUTTAL PS
CRIME NO.0008/2022) ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND CJM HAVERI, AT HAVERI FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S
279, 337, 304(A) OF IPC R/W SEC. 3, 181, 5, 180, 134 (A AND B)
AND 187 OF INDIAN MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 AGAINST THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2578
CRL.P No. 103367 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. None appears for the petitioner.
2. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with.
3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM / Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7