Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/103223/2022 of PRASHANT MOHAN NAIK Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2668 CRL.P No. 103223 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103223 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: PRASHANT MOHAN NAIK, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2668
CRL.P No. 103223 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103223 OF 2022
(482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
PRASHANT MOHAN NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/O. HAKKALAGERI HOSUR,
SIDDAPUR TQ. UK DIST-581355.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.G.KADADAKATTI, ADVOCATE)-ABSENT
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY SIDDAPUR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH,DHARWAD-580011.
2.
THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF
POSTS SIRSI SUB DIVISION SIRSI,
UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT-581403.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI SACHIN ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI AVINASH M.ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN
C.C. NO. 600/2021, PENDING ON THE FILE OF JMFC., SIDDAPUR, FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 409 OF I.P.C REGISTERED BY THE
SIDDAPUR POLICE STATION AGAINST THE PETITIONER CONCERN AND
ETC.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2668
CRL.P No. 103223 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation.
2. Order sheet discloses that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently.
3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
CLK Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 108