Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/103867/2023 of SRI MOULASAB S/O PEERASAB Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2666 CRL.P No. 103867 of 2023 C/W CRL.P No. 101727 of 2022 CRL.P No. 103866 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103867 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) C/W

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103867 OF 2023

(482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))

C/W

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101727 OF 2022

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103866 OF 2023

IN CRL.P NO. 103867/2023

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI MOULASAB S/O PEERASAB

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION.

BUSINESSMAN

2.

SRI P.G. MANJUNATHA S/O GURUSWAMY

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER

3.

SRI NAGARAJ M. S/O MARATI THIPPANNA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER

4.

SRI PRAKASH S/O DEVAPPA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER

5.

A.P VIJAYKUMAR S/O PANDURANGA

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER

6.

SRI T. HIRESWAMY S/O LATE THIPPESWAMY

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:

BUSINESSMAN

HC-KAR

PETITIONERS NO. 1 TO 6 ARE

R/AT TARANAGARA VILLAGE, SANDUR TALUK,

BALLARI DISTRICT 583119.

7.

SR T.G. SOMASHEKHARA S/O LINGAPPA

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION DRIVER

RESIDING AT LINGADAHALLI VILLAGE,

SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT 583134.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SUNILKUMAR BANGARI AND SRI. A.D. UPADHYE, ADVOCATES)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY GADIGANOOR POLICE STATION,

GADIGANOOR 583223

REPRESENTED BY

SPP. HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA,

DHARWAD 580008.

2.

SRI JAYAKUMAR S/O SUBBAYYA

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. FACTORY WORKER, RESIDING AT VIDYANAGARA TOWNSHIP, SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT 583123.

…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.L. VANTI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON

THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT AT SANDUR

IN CC NO.515/2021 AND CHARGE SHEET FILED IN CRIME

NO.45/2021

BY

THE

GADIGANOOR

POLICE

STATION,

GADIGANOOR

DIST.

BALLARI,

FOR

THE

OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE U/S 143, 147, 341, 504 AND 506 R/W SECTION

149 OF IPC, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 7

ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

HC-KAR

BETWEEN:

1.

SIDDANAGOUDA

AGE.47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS

R/O.BHUJANGANAGARA,

SANDUR, TQ.BALLARI, KARNATAKA-583101.

2.

SANJAY HANDUR

AGE.42 YEARS, OCC.JINDAL COMPANY EMPLOYEE, R/O.TORANGALLUR, SANDUR, TQ.BALLARI, KARNATAKA-583101.

3.

JAYA KUMAR

AGE.39 YEARS, OCC.JINDAL COMPANY EMPLOYEE, R/O.TORANGALLUR, SANDUR, TQ.BALLARI, KARNATAKA-583101.

4.

ABOOBAKAR

AGE.37 YEARS, OCC.JINDAL COMPANY EMPLOYEE, R/O.TORANGALLUR, SANDUR, TQ.BALLARI, KARNATAKA-583101.

5.

VAJRAMUTTI

AGE.41 YEARS, OCC.JINDAL COMPANY EMPLOYEE, R/O.TORANGALLUR, SANDUR, TQ.BALLARI, KARNATAKA-583101.

6.

SHEKARAPPA

AGE.36 YEARS, OCC.JINDAL COMPANY EMPLOYEE, R/O.TORANGALLUR, SANDUR, TQ.BALLARI, KARNATAKA-583101.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. M.L. VANTI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V.M.

SHEELAVANT, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, SANDUR P.S.,

REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580001.

HC-KAR

2.

BABU S/O JAGYA NAIK

AGE.42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,

R/O.SUSHILNAGAR,

SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI-583101.

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;

SRI. VISHWANATH HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF

CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR

AGAINST

THE

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

NO.1

TO

REGISTERED

IN

SANDUR

POLICE

STATION

CRIME

NO.64/2022 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER

SECTION. 143, 147, 323, 504, 506 R/W 149 OF IPC AND

SECTION

3(1)(R)

AND

3(1)(S)

OF

SC

AND

ST

(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT 1989, PENDING ON

THE FILE OF I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BALLARI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

IN CRL.P NO. 103866/2023

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI J. BABUNAIK S/O JAGGU NAIK

AGE 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN,

RESIDING AT SANDUR, SANDUR TALUK,

2.

MOULA SAB S/O PEERASAB

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN,

3.

P.G. MANJUNATHA S/O GURUSWAMY

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,

4.

NAGARAJA M. S/O MARATI THIPPANNA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,

5.

SHIVAMURTHY M. S/O MALLIKARJUNA

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,

6.

PRAKASH S/O DEVAPPA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,

HC-KAR

7.

B. JEELAN S/O MOHAMMED ALI

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.DRIVER,

PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 7 ARE

RESIDING AT TARANAGARA VILLAGE, SANDUR TALUK,

BALLARI DISTRICT-583119.

8.

T.G. SOMASHEKHARA S/O LINGAPPA

AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN,

RESIDING AT.LINGADAHALLI VILLAGE, SANDUR

TALUK,

BALLARI DISTRICT-583134.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SUNILKUMAR BANGARI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY GADIGANOOR PS

GADIGANOOR-583223

REP BY SPP. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD 580008.

2.

SRI. JAYAKUMAR S/O SUBBAYYA

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. FACTORY WORKER, RESIDING AT. VIDYANAGARA TOWNSHIP, SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT-583123.

...RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.L. VANTI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF

CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS

PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

COURT AT SANDUR IN CC NO.517/2021 AND CHARGE

SHEET FILED IN CRIME NO.44/2021 BY THE GADIGANOOR

POLICE

STATION,

GADIGANOOR

FOR

THE

OFFENCE

PUNISHABLE U/S 149, 147, 143, 504, 341 AND 506 OF

IPC, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1, 2 AND 4

TO 9 ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

HC-KAR

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS

DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

Under signed counsel appearing for petitioner most respectfully prays before this Hon’ble Court. That, kindly be pleased to permit this petition to withdraw above petition with liberty to file discharge application before the trial court in interest of justice.”

2. Placing the memo on record, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for.

Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

AC LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 45

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead