Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/103516/2023 of PAVIRA W/O ANILRAJ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2585 CRL.P No. 103516 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103516 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. PAVIRA W/O ANILRAJ AGE. 21 YEARS, OCC.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2585
CRL.P No. 103516 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103516 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
PAVIRA W/O ANILRAJ
AGE. 21 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,
R/O. NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE,
YEMARUS, TQ. AND DIST. RAICHUR.
2.
SAVITA W/O PAGUNTEPPA
AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,
R/O. NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE,
YEMARUS, TQ. AND DIST. RAICHUR.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY GANGAVATI P.S.
R/BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580008.
2.
SUJATHA W/O. LATE HANUMANTRAYA
AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,
R/O. BYPASS ROAD, HIREJANTKAL NAGAVATI,
TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ADMIT THE PETITION, CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH
THE IMPUGNED FIR AND THE CHARGE SHEET VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND
B FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES U/S 307, 323, 326, 504 AND 506 R/W
34 OF IPC AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO IT IN S.C.
NO.48/2022 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE KOPPAL, VIDE ANNEXURE-C, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2585
CRL.P No. 103516 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. None appears for the petitioners.
2. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with.
3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 14