Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/100240/2023 of MANJUNATHA G S/O JANGAMA REDDY Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC-D:2573 CRL.P No. 100240 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100240 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MANJUNATHA G. S/O JANGAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 30
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100240 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
MANJUNATHA G. S/O JANGAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS
2.
JANGAMA REDDY S/O VENKATARAMALU
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS
3.
MADHUKUMAR S/O JANGAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS.
4.
SAROJA W/O MADHUKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
OCC. BUSINESS AND HOUSEHOLD WORK.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT 3RD CROSS,
SIDDARTH LAYOUT VARANASHI K.R.PURAM,
BENGALURU-580 063.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. A.R. PATIL AND SRI. ARVIND R. HALLIKAR, ADVOCATES)- ABSENT
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
HOSAPETE RURAL P.S
BY ADDL. SPP.,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD-580 011.
2.
NAVEENA YADAV W/O MANUNATHA G.
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE
R/O 7TH WARD SHANKAR COLONY,
M.P.PRAKASH NAGAR HOSPETE,
DIST VIJAYANAGAR-583 201.
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR 1; NOTICE SERVED TO R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO. 1936/2018
PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. C.J. AND JMFC, HOSAPETE FOR
THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W SEC. 149 OF IPC
AND R/W 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT IN HOSAPETE RURAL P.S. CRIME NO.
79/2018 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS ONLY BY ALLOWING THIS
PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. Court notice issued to the petitioners returned with an endorsement as ‘un-served’, as the petitioners are not residing in the address shown in the cause title.
2. This Court by way of abundant caution has issued Court notice taking note of the fact that the learned counsel for petitioners was permitted to retire from the case.
HC-KAR
3. Left with no alternative, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM / Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 2