Karnataka High Court

WP/200866/2023 of MUKTAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2024:KHC-K:4514 WP No. 200866 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.200866 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MUKTAMMA W/O ZHAREPPA AGE: 78 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O ALIYABAD(J) TQ: AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ

WRIT PETITION NO.200866 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

MUKTAMMA W/O ZHAREPPA

AGE: 78 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,

R/O ALIYABAD(J) TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR

2.

VITHAL S/O NARSU

AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: RET. TEACHER,

R/O ALIYABAD, (J) TQ AND DIST: BIDAR.

3.

SUBHASH S/O NARSU

AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: TAILORING,

R/O ALIYABAD, (J) TQ AND DIST: BIDAR.

4.

JAGADEVI W/O NAGANATH,

AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,

R/O ALIYABAD, (J) TQ AND DIST: BIDAR.

5.

SANJEEV S/O SHARNAPPA

AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: LABOUR,

R/O ALIYABAD, (J) TQ AND DIST: BIDAR.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. JAIRAJ K. BUKKA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

DEPT OF REVENUE VIDHAN SOUDHA,

Digitally signed

by

MARKONAHALLI

RAMU PRIYA

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

BANGALORE-560 001.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BIDAR

TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585401.

3.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BIDAR,

TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585401.

4.

THE TAHSILDAR, BIDAR

TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585401.

5.

REVENUE INSPECTOR

ALIYABAD (J) TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585404.

6.

VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT

ALIYABAD (J) TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585404.

7.

MARUTI S/O SHANKEREPPA

AGE: MAJOR, OCC: LAOBUR,

R/O ALIYABAD, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585404.

8.

RAJKUMAR S/O SHANKEREPPA

AGE: MAJOR, OCC: LABOUR,

R/O ALIYABAD, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585401.

9.

ASHOK S/O SHANKEREPPA

AGE: MAJOR, OCC: LABOUR,

R/O ALIYABAD, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585404.

10.

SRIMANTH S/O RAJKUMAR

AGE: MAJOR, OCC: LABOUR,

R/O ALIYABAD(J) TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR-585404.

GPA HOLDER RESPONDENT NO 7 TO 9

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE

A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ORDER BY

QUASHING THE 3RD RESPONDENT IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED

AT ANNEXURE-H VIDE REV/APPEAL/CR-66/2022-23/3251 ON

DATED 23.01.2023. B) ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF

MANDAMUS

OR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

OR

DIRECTIONS

TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO MAINTAIN THE RTC IN THE NAME PETITIONER NO 01 AT COLUMN NO9 AND 12/2 AS PATTADAR IN THE LAND SY NO 15 MEASURING 03 ACRES 10 GUNTAS SITUATED AT VILLAGE BAGE-E-KARANJA TQ AND DIST BIDAR.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Despite grant of time to comply the office objections, the same is not done. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.

Sd/- JUDGE

LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 6SMP CT:SI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead