Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/811/2020 of M/S PERK-INN INTERNATIONAL LTD Vs STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGARA POLICE on 9 October 2026
2026:KHC:56639
CNR: KAHC010451602019 NC: 2026:KHC:56639 CRL.P No. 811 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.811 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. PERK-INN INTERNATIONAL LTD., NO.183, VIBHAVA, 1ST
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010451602019
NC: 2026:KHC:56639
CRL.P No. 811 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.811 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. PERK-INN INTERNATIONAL LTD.,
NO.183, VIBHAVA, 1ST BLOCK,
KORAMANGALAL, BANGALORE
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
SRI. K.KARUNAKARAN,
S/O. P.P.KAVERI CHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 1795, 8TH MAIN SECTOR,
HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560073.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B R RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGARA POLICE
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF ACCEPTING ‘B’ REPORT ACCEPTED
BY THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSORE IN
CR.NO.76/2007 VIDE ORDER DATED 16.06.2015 AND TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY LEARNED 2ND ADDITIONAL
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
Page 1 of 2
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010451602019
NC: 2026:KHC:56639
CRL.P No. 811 of 2020
DISTRICT
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE
AT
MYSURU
DATED
31.10.2018
IN
CRL.RP.NO.318/2018
AND
DIRECT
THE
RESPONDENT POLICE TO RE-INVESTIGATE THE CASE ON
MERITS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This petition was filed in 2020 and this Court noticed non- impleading of accused by learned counsel for petitioner and granted a week’s time to implead the accused vide order dated 26.07.2024. Inspite of granting sufficient time, for a period of 2 years, no such application is filed to implead the accused as party to the proceedings. Hence, it is very clear that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter even after lapse of 6 years. Therefore, no grounds to continue the proceedings Accordingly, the criminal is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…