Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/13505/2024 of MRS. ZAIBUNNISA Vs SMT. NAZIMUNNISA ARSHIYA on 7 October 2026

2026:KHC:56210

CNR: KAHC010702082024 NC: 2026:KHC:56210 CRL.P No. 13505 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13505 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. ZAIBUNNISA W/O LATE JANAB ABDUL RAUF SAHEB

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010702082024

NC: 2026:KHC:56210

CRL.P No. 13505 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13505 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

1.

MRS. ZAIBUNNISA

W/O LATE JANAB ABDUL RAUF SAHEB

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

2.

MR. NAVEED PASHA

LATE JANAB RAUF SAHEB 2

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

3.

MRS. YASMEEN @ YASMEEN SULTANA

LATE JANAB ABDUL RAUF SAHEB

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

ALL ARE RESIDING AT :27/10, 2ND CROSS

OLD PENSION MOHALLA COTTONPET

MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU

KARNATAKA 560 053

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. AFROZ PASHA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

SMT. NAZIMUNNISA ARSHIYA

W/O MOHAMMED JAVEED PASHA

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE

C/O SMT IRSHADUNNISA

W/O LATE MOHMMED MUSTAFA

JANATHA COLONY, MUTHTHINAKOPPA

NARASIMHARAJAPURA TALUK

CHIKKAMANGALURU-577 134

…RESPONDENT

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS) OF

CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

Page 1 of 2

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010702082024

NC: 2026:KHC:56210

CRL.P No. 13505 of 2024

CRL.MISC.NO.61/2022 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT FILED

U/S.12 OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN VIOLENCE ACT 2005 R/W

SEC.125 OF CRPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE

AND JMFC NARASIMHARAJAPURA CHIKKAMAGLURU.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.

2. This Court ordered to issue notice to the respondent on 12.12.2024. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/-

(RAJESH RAI K)

JUDGE

HKV/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead