Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8361/2019 of SRI T NAGARAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 7 October 2026
2026:KHC:56095
CNR: KAHC010524192019 NC: 2026:KHC:56095 CRL.P No. 8361 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8361 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI T NAGARAJ S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 2.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8361 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI T NAGARAJ
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
2.
SRI T VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/O. MARKONAHALLI VILLAGE
AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572130
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI BHARGAV G, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY AMRUTHUHR POLICE STATION
KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001
2.
SRI NAGARAJA M T
S/O SRI. THIMMAIAH GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
MARKONAHALLI VILLAGE
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
Page 1 of 3
AMRUTHUR HOBLI
KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMAKURU-572130
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SUHAS GOWDA M, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.64/2018 AND
THE ORDER DATED 13.11.2018 TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE
OFFENCES AND THE SAME PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC,
KUNIGAL,
TUMKUR
REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/S 323, 324, 354B, 504, 506, 509 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed praying this Court to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.64/2018 and the order dated 13.11.2018 taking cognizance of the offences for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 354B, 504, 506, 507 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
HC-KAR
Page 2 of 3
3. Having perused the material available on record, it discloses that there are eyewitnesses to the incident and injuries are also sustained. Though injuries are simple in nature, the Trial Court has to decide with regard to the nature of injuries. When the witnesses who have witnessed the incident also made the statement before the Investigating Officer for having witnessed the incident and pacified the same and snatched the weapons which were in the hands of the accused persons, it is a matter of trial and this Court cannot quash the proceedings as sought in the petition by the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners have not made out any grounds to quash the proceedings.
4. In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following:
ORDER
The petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…