Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/3444/2024 of HANUMEGOWDA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 7 October 2026

2026:KHC:56204

CNR: KAHC010203032024 NC: 2026:KHC:56204 CRL.P No. 3444 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3444 OF 2024 BETWEEN: HANUMEGOWDA S/O LATE PUTTACHENNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010203032024

NC: 2026:KHC:56204

CRL.P No. 3444 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3444 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

HANUMEGOWDA

S/O LATE PUTTACHENNAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

R/AT BUDAMANAHALLI, AREKERE POST,

YELAHANKA TALUK,

BANGALORE NORTH - 560 064.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SUDHINDRA S.A, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY KOLLEGALA RURAL POLICE STATION,

CHAMRAJNAGAR DISTRICT - 562 101.

REP: BY SPP

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BANGALORE

2.

M. SHIVA

S/O MUTHU KOVIL KOTEYURU VILLAGE,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

KAVERIPURAM POST,

METUR TALUQ, SALEM,

TAMIL NADU - 636 115.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH

THE

CHARGE

SHEET

IN

C.C.NO.1443/2023

IN

CR.NO.05/2022 FILED BY THE KOLLEGAL POLICE STATION ON

THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

KOLLEGALA FOR THE OFFENCE P/US 392,427,341,506,34 OF

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

Page 1 of 2

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010203032024

NC: 2026:KHC:56204

CRL.P No. 3444 of 2024

IPC

CRIMINAL

PROCEEDINGS

INITIATED

AGAINST

THE

PETITIONERS.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.

2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 27.08.2024. Despite, the petitioner has not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/-

(RAJESH RAI K)

JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead