Karnataka High Court

WP/2984/2024 of MR MANUEL PERIERA Vs CHIEF MANAGER on 7 October 2026

2026:KHC:55901

CNR: KAHC010062652024 NC: 2026:KHC:55901 WP No. 2984 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7 TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.2984 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR MANUEL PERIERA S/O MATHEW PERIERA AGED 58

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010062652024

NC: 2026:KHC:55901

WP No. 2984 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

WRIT PETITION NO.2984 OF 2024 (GM-DRT)

BETWEEN:

1.

MR MANUEL PERIERA

S/O MATHEW PERIERA

AGED 58 YEARS,

103, FIRST FLOOR, PVR TOWER,

CHINNAPPA LANE, ITI COLONY,

COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI MAIN ROD,

BANGALORE NORTH, FRAZER TOWN,

BANGALORE URBAN - 560005.

2.

RUPHINA PEREIRA

W/O MANUEL PERIERA

AGED 52 YEARS,

103, FIRST FLOOR, PVR TOWER

CHINNAPPA LANE, ITI COLONY,

COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,

BANGALORE NORTH, FRAZER TOWN,

BANGALORE URBAN - 560 005.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

CHIEF MANAGER

AUTHORIZED OFFICER

SOUTH INDIA BANK LTD.,

SIB ARCADE

NO.61, WHEELER ROAD, COX TOWN,

BANGALORE - 560 005.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. NARAYANA SHENOY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

Digitally signed by

MAHALAKSHMI B M

Location: High Court

of Karnataka

Page 1 of 2

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010062652024

NC: 2026:KHC:55901

WP No. 2984 of 2024

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE

ISSUED TO THE PETITIONERS DATED 10.01.2024 IN REF.NO:

BLR:RO:REC:245:23-24 BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IS HEREWITH

PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. A memo to that effect has been filed.

2. Memo reads as under: “That the petitioners in the above petition submits that the petitioners does not want to press the above petition as the prayer sought by the petitioners has become infructuous. Hence the above petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead